Joseph Wong Nehal Bhuta Jillian Clare Cohen
Joseph Wong
Dissecting democracy
When a country undergoes
democratic reform, what
happens to state-controlled
services like health care?
Political scientist Joseph Wong has searched Asia
for answers to this question.And what has the
Canada Research Chair in Democratization,Health
and Development found? “Countries like Taiwan and
South Korea have bucked conventional wisdom on
globalization, which tells us that democratization
means de-legislation of these so-called quality-of-life
policies.” His book,Healthy Democracies, expands on
this phenomenon.
Wong isn’t finished with the region.Next,he’s looking
at the emerging biotech sector in Taiwan,South Korea
and Singapore, examining ways in which these
countries are creating rather than copying technology.
“In the past, innovation happened in Europe and the
West and countries in Asia would copy the technology
and do it cheaper and faster. Now, they’re creating
their own.”Wong calls this phenomenon “life at the
technological frontier” and wants to know what
political and economic life is like there. “What’s it like
for these countries which are creating as opposed
to copying? How are they adapting in terms of public
policy, and re-constituting firms, businesses and
industrial associations?”
Closer to home, Wong is also director of the Asian
Institute at U of T’s Munk Centre for International
Studies, where about 100 researchers conduct
interdisciplinary research on Asia. “We want to
create an environment where someone working,
for example, on industrial policy in Japan, can have
a substantive conversation with someone working
on Indian literature. It’s where you have these
intellectual collisions that great things happen.”
The Asian Institute organizes and sponsors more
than 70 seminars, workshops and lectures a year.
“We’re at a really good moment in Asian Studies
here at U of T.The top people working on Asia
want to come here. That’s why I find it so appealing.”
– Anjali Baichwal
TOP
Nehal Bhuta
Justice for all
Say what you like about former Iraqi
president Saddam Hussein,but Nehal
Bhuta doesn’t believe he got a fair trial.
Bhuta, an expert in international
criminal and humanitarian law who joined U of T’s Faculty
of Law in January as an assistant professor,witnessed
the trial of Hussein first-hand on behalf of Human Rights
Watch (HRW). A report he co-authored on the trial has
received widespread media coverage.
Hussein was on trial for crimes against humanity
involving an incident that took place in 1982.After an
assassination attempt on Hussein, suspects were tortured
and many sent into internal exile. About 150 people
were tried before a court and sentenced to death.
Bhuta says that there were a number of problems
with Hussein’s trial, beginning with the court itself.
“Human Rights Watch had advocated for an International
Criminal Tribunal (similar to the one used to try war crimes
committed in the former Yugoslavia) or a mixed court
with international and Iraqi participation to ensure that
basic legal standards were met. But the U.S.was opposed
to that and used only Iraqi judges and prosecutors.
“The judgement reflects the fact that the court didn’t
have the adequate level of international legal training.
The Iraqi judge and lawyers had been insulated from
international developments for 30 years. The result is a
decision that is legally defective.”
The key problem, Bhuta says, is that the court never
made a tangible connection between the crimes against
humanity and Hussein. “And because of that gap, the
court was forced to make findings that were never
actually proven in court.”
Not only was Hussein unfairly tried and executed
“but it was a missed opportunity. It wouldn’t have been
hard to prove these crimes through an accepted
international legal process. And it would have exposed
the crimes that took place. Instead, they wound up with
a trial tainted by unfairness.”
It’s an ironic position for HRW to take,as the group
previously criticized the Iraqi regime under Hussein.
“Human rights apply to everybody,” says
Bhuta. “Justice is important and you have to get it
right, no matter who is on trial.”
– Paul Fraumeni
TOP
Jillian Clare Cohen
Pills and politics
What's a political scientist doing
in a place like this?
This is a sunny office in
U of T’s Leslie L. Dan Faculty of
Pharmacy building where Jillian Clare Cohen is putting
her research on global drug access into practice.
“Political science and pharmaceutical policy go
together perfectly: it’s all about power, interests and
resource management,” says Cohen, an assistant
professor of Pharmacy and Director of U of T’s
Comparative Program on Health and Society.
Her first career took her around the world,
conducting research on pharmaceutical policy for
UNESCO,UNICEF, the World Bank and the World Health
Organization (WHO). It exposed her to people just
trying to get medicine. “One-third of the global
population doesn’t have access to medicine.This is
wrong. So I decided to channel my work into trying to
do something about it.”
Cohen’s recent book, The Power of Pills: Social, Ethical
and Legal Issues in Drug Development, Marketing and
Pricing Policies, demonstrates how access to drugs is a
multi-layered issue.One layer, for example, is intellectual
property rights and drug access, an issue on which she
is conducting research with Dr. James Orbinski, formerly
of Doctors Without Borders and a senior fellow at U of T’s
Munk Centre for International Studies.
She’s also focused on corruption in the global
distribution of drugs — from the manufacture of
counterfeit drugs to improper pricing — and has consulted
for various governments on the subject. “There
is a lot of corruption, especially in countries that are
unable to regulate the sector,” she says. The WHO is using
Cohen’s research to help understand and fight corruption
in drug delivery. She has also been invited to be a
member of the WHO Global Advisory Group on Good
Governance in Medicines.
Now a mother of twin toddlers, Cohen stays
closer to home and distills her hands-on experience
through her students. “They are conducting research
in a diverse range of countries and they’re excited
and motivated to get results.”
– Anjali Baichwal
TOP
RESEARCH AND INNOVATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · SUMMER 2007 · VOL.8, NO.2