Ethical Conduct of Research
U of T is committed to the highest standards of ethical conduct in research. The University of Toronto’s Policy on Ethical Conduct in Research sets “the highest standards of ethical conduct in every aspect of research including applications, proposals, the research itself, reports and publications” as an expectation of all members of the University.
More information: Policy on Ethical Conduct in Research
The University of Toronto Framework to Address Allegations of Research Misconduct sets out the process under which the University responds to allegations of research misconduct.
The Framework defines research misconduct as “any research practice that deviates seriously from the commonly accepted ethics/integrity standards or practices of the relevant research community and includes but is not limited to intentional fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism as defined by the University’s Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters. However, in the latter respect, due latitude is given for honest errors, honest differences in methodology, interpretation or judgement, or divergent paradigms in science; what is at issue are genuine breaches of the integrity of the research process.”
The Framework provides a number of illustrative examples of research misconduct. Individual faculties and divisions may modify the examples of research misconduct to fit their particular research circumstances and the norms of their disciplines. If other enhancement is viewed as necessary by a faculty or division, it must be discussed with and approved by the Vice-President, Research and Innovation.
The Framework identifies a two-stage process: an initial gathering and review of information at an inquiry stage and, if warranted, a subsequent investigation. The Vice-President, Research and Innovation is the central point of contact for all allegations of research misconduct.
The Framework applies to all of the University’s full-time and part-time faculty, staff and students (excluding undergraduate students doing research for credit, whose obligations are covered under the Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters) and any person (including but not limited to clinical faculty, visiting professors, and post-doctoral fellows) who conducts research at or under the auspices of the University.
If a complaint is made against a person who has an appointment at, or conducts research in, a fully affiliated or community affiliated teaching hospital, institutional jurisdiction over the complaint will be determined in accordance with the Faculty of Medicine Research Misconduct Framework Addendum: Procedures for Determining Jurisdiction in Complaints Involving Certain Non-University Institutions.
To make a submission, please email email@example.com
Policies and Procedures
All research at U of T is conducted with the support of a number of policies, guidelines and procedures. These documents are openly available for reference.
More information: See Policies, Guidelines and Procedures